Compared

Notula and HackMD

HackMD is the closest thing to Notula on this list: collaborative Markdown, comments, GitHub integration. The difference is where the document actually lives.

What HackMD is better at

What Notula is better at

Side by side

Capability HackMD Notula
Comment on a passage, reply, resolve
Real-time co-editing
Runs in a browser, nothing to install
Presentation mode
The repository is the only copy
Comments committed to the repository
Works offline
No third-party service holds the document
WYSIWYG with no syntax on screen

Both columns are filled in, including the rows Notula loses. A table where one column is ticks all the way down is an advert, and the first four rows of this one are things the other tool does and Notula does not.

Which one to use

Use HackMD when

People need to be in the same document at the same moment, or the readers cannot install anything. HackMD is built for exactly that and Notula is not.

Use Notula when

The documents are already in the repository and you would rather not have a second copy of them in a service, especially one your security review has to look at.

Try it against a real repository

Free, with no account and no server. Open a repository you already have and the documents in it are a tree in about a second.

Apple silicon and Windows x64 above. Intel and Arm builds, and what to do if macOS calls it damaged.

Other comparisons